Back to Top


 

Disclaimer: Letters to the Editor do not necessarily represent the opinions of Stu News Laguna but rather the opinions of the letter writer.


Laguna needs to make some noise on possible airport changes

Newport Beach has taken the offensive and is paying attention to the FAA, Orange County Supervisors, and anyone else getting into this conversation. The plan is to expand John Wayne Airport to allow more private planes and expand hours of use to 24/7, thus expanding flight path options. We went through this several years ago and I thought it was a done deal. Apparently it is not and we need to make our voices heard. What are the options – is anyone at city hall keeping up on this and what do we need to do?

The last few issues of Stu News Newport are filled with Letters to the Editor banging on drums from those living under the flight path – primarily Balboa Island and the Peninsula, where many wealthy folks have flocked to.

Last time this happened most people ignored the noise when the flight path was changed to going over towards Huntington Beach and Laguna Beach again. This time it will be more private planes and longer hours. The intent is to bring more business to OC and the airport wants it as well as most of Orange County. Is this something we want? What do we need to do? Call our Council members and make some noise.   

Ganka Brown

Laguna Beach


The president won’t work with Democrats?

If the reports are true that President Donald Trump told House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer he can’t (or won’t) work with Democrats until their investigations are over, then we really are headed toward a constitutional crisis.

If the President of the United States refuses to work with the loyal opposition, then he truly is unfit for office. No matter how uncomfortable things are for Mr. Trump right now, my hope is Republican lawmakers in Washington will remind him that America was built on a foundation of compromise not tyranny. That said, it’s time to get back to work, even with people you don’t like.

Denny Freidenrich

Laguna Beach


Laguna Beach should stop using deadly rodent poisons

The Laguna Canyon Conservancy (LCC) is a volunteer environmental group dedicated to save Laguna Canyon and preserve it as natural.

The LCC Board of Directors would like to urge our city to join other communities around the state, nation, and world to stop the use of deadly rodent poisons.

It is our mission to help preserve and protect the 22,000 acres of open space that surrounds Laguna Beach, including its diverse and abundant wildlife. The use of toxic rodenticides – by residents and businesses adjacent to this open space – is sickening and killing individual creatures as well as harming the natural balance of life in these settings.

As background, residents and businesses (mainly food-related) use traps baited with deadly poisons to control rodents. However, most traps don’t capture or contain the dying rodents, which wander away where other birds and animals eat them. Those animals – everything from hawks and owls to coyotes and bobcats – eat the dying rodents and are sickened themselves and often die from poisoning. (An estimated 80-90 percent of living natural predators have been found with poison in them.)

Also, domestic pets and even children often consume these poisons, and grow sick, and sometimes die. (Poison centers report 10,000 children are exposed to rat or mice poison each year.)

There are less toxic alternatives to controlling unwanted rodents. In fact, the very predators that are being decimated by secondary poisoning are our best natural defense against unwanted rodents.

It’s time we stop poisoning our land, our animals, and ourselves. Because we are surrounded by our treasured Greenbelt of open space, we have a unique responsibility to protect the wildlife that lives there. As a forward-thinking city with a long history of environmental activism, Laguna Beach should be a leader in the push to rid our communities of all poisons.

We would like to encourage the City of Laguna Beach to take a stand to get poisons out of our city particularly our municipal parks. Many other communities have banned these toxic chemicals, including Irvine, Malibu, San Francisco, Ojai, Thousand Oaks, Davis, Marin County, Napa, etc., which banned city-use of pesticides, including on its public school grounds. Please consider passing a resolution (in the form of a non-binding ordinance) that would:

A. Urge businesses in the city, especially restaurants and other eateries, to no longer use or sell anticoagulant rodenticides.

B. Urge all property owners to cease purchasing or using anticoagulant rodenticides on their properties in Laguna Beach.

C. Commit the City of Laguna Beach to not use anticoagulant rodenticides as part of its maintenance program for city-owned parks and facilities.

We would be happy to work with the city on this resolution and help get out the word on this issue and alternative solutions. It’s our opinion that most residents and business owners in town would support this resolution once they learn about and understand the harm these poisons are doing to our surrounding wildlife and residents.

Please let us know if we can provide any additional information about this issue.

Thanks for considering this resolution. If you would like to discuss this matter with me, please contact me at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or (949) 939-7257.

Gene Felder
President of Laguna Canyon Conservancy

Laguna Beach


Thank you, Laguna, for your support of the Charm House Tour

Thank you, Laguna, for supporting Village Laguna and the Charm House Tour last Sunday. In the 1915 Settlement Cottage (restored with the assistance of Laguna architect Todd Skenderian) tour-goers were transported to the early days of Laguna Beach, when many families built their own summer cottages. Two houses from the 1920s, one a Dutch Colonial Revival and the other an English cottage, and a Mid-Century Modern home designed by Knowlton Fernald Jr., were resplendent in their colorful gardens. Completing the “century of Laguna charm” was a recently rebuilt contemporary home designed by architect Paul McClean, whose signature use of glass to meld outside and inside made the division between house and vistas almost indistinguishable. 

We’re grateful to all the people who helped make the tour a success: the homeowners who graciously opened their doors to us, the businesses who assisted by selling tickets for the event, the hundred-or-so volunteers who made things run so smoothly, and the many Lagunans and guests from elsewhere – more this year than last – who, through their support, demonstrated that what the early settlers called the “Laguna spirit” is still alive and well.   

Johanna Felder

President of Village Laguna

Laguna Beach


Tale of Two Superintendents

Dr. Joanne Culverhouse remains the most successful educational leader in local public school history. She was principal at El Morro Elementary School, Thurston Middle School, and Laguna Beach High School. A whole generation learned under her mentorship K though 12. She not only knew most students by name, but knew their siblings and parents, each family’s strengths and challenges.

“Dr. C” was singularly competent, confident, a natural leader, and skilled academic affairs manager with a strategic vision for even better schools in the future. A master communicator with a strong community service track record, it didn’t go unnoticed by students she’s a competitive triathlete and outdoor adventurer. 

Culverhouse was comfortable talking about both weaknesses and strengths of schools, her own as well. Not afraid of accountability, her record on objective achievement metrics trended up. She set the gold standard for blending commitment to excellence and compassion, so teachers, parents, but most of all students feel both valued and loved. 

As LBHS principal Culverhouse was so admired it seemed over time to create personal, professional, and even political jealously by the School Board majority and a Superintendent with no PhD or depth of experience that seemed comparable to Culverhouse.

Seemingly without justification the Superintendent repeatedly passed over Culverhouse for promotion to Assistant Superintendent, in effect if not purposefully forcing Culverhouse to leave the District for equal opportunity in career development. She became Assistant Superintendent in Palos Verdes, our loss.

The School Board did nothing, hiding behind the falsehood that personnel matters were a prerogative of the Superintendent, contrary to state education code Section 35161, which states the Board retains all residual powers and remains responsible for all actions under powers delegated to the Superintendent. 

When that Superintendent made what many felt was a long overdue decision to resign, Dr. Culverhouse applied for the job in which many felt she was a perfect fit. To the stunned shock of thousands who supported her, our School Board denied her advancement to the second interview stage with far less qualified candidates, in the view of many confirming the Board majority had been unsupportive of her based on personal and political not professional criteria.

Laguna Beach schools were Culverhouse’s first choice, but she was not the Board’s, so with typical professional enthusiasm she embraced the opportunity to be Superintendent of La Habra schools. She’s now credited for a strong and successful bottom-to-top strategic program reform and transformational enhancement of classroom learning in that district.

In January of 2018, the hands-on hardworking Culverhouse was named one of the 100 most influential people in the county by the OC Register. Now she has just been named “Superintendent of the Year” in our region by the Association of California Administrators.

In contrast, our current Superintendent hired instead of Dr. C seemingly projects what many perceive as a sense of entitlement and privilege, at the same time becoming mired in School Board governance legal and political turmoil. For example, he has not denied questions on the public record as to whether he failed to inform the Board that it arguably was violating state law by meeting to discuss matters not on a publicly noticed agenda on November 17,  2017.

Nor did he inform the Board at that meeting if it should amend its bylaws on rotation of all members willing to serve as presiding Board officers for a year, rather than what many feel was to violate a binding bylaw to that effect only to then repeal it after the fact.

As a result now we have a de facto Board President who many feel was not properly installed serving her third term. The Superintendent has acquiesced, it seems, in that and other unresolved legal disputes over civic order, rule of law, and due process in school governance.

For example, a state court judge has ruled that our Superintendent exceeded his authority by ordering permanent entries in student records related to discipline incidents never fully investigated. In the opinion of many who learned the truth, including an impartial judge, that matter important to the community was handled improperly by the Superintendent.

This Superintendent then refused to obey the court’s order to remove the entries, and only when the judge threatened to hold him in contempt of court did he comply. But then after complying with the court’s order the Superintendent initiated a costly appeal.

Since the lawsuit was over whether the entries should remain in the student transcripts, and the Superintendent removed the legally unjustified notations from the records, what public interest is served by appealing the case?

It seems to many the answer is tax dollars were spent to seek expungement of a ruling our Superintendent exceeded his authority. Is this in part because the Superintendent does not want the ruling to cloud his future employment options as his problems here mount, as many of us predicted?

This Superintendent seemingly has been more focused on school governance conflict and controversy about the legal nature of his authority, responsibility, as well as that of the Board than he has in being an excellent academic leader of the education mission.

Even as teachers, students, and parents are achieving new highs in academics, the school governance process of the School Board has reached new lows. An obsession with secrecy and avoidance of open transparent proceedings and deliberations is the hallmark of the Superintendent and School Board, it seems.

For example, the Board has appropriated over $120,000 in this year alone on investigations of school district employees over unresolved and highly politicized legal and policy disputes. The Board has spent tens of thousands on “governance training” workshops that too often are scripted seemingly to take sides in pending disputes aimed at silencing minority voices in the community.

As a result, instead of institutional capacity building to sustain higher governance standards, many feel we lack the leadership on the Board to end adversarial, stressful, and in my view borderline paranoid school governance practices by the current Board majority. 

Howard Hills

Laguna Beach


Discovering Brown’s Park

I found this unique little park by accident while out on a walk. Having moved to Laguna Beach recently, I was still in the phase of exploration, which paired well with my goal to get more exercise – and what an amazing place to do it in!

On this particular morning I decided to explore a different area of downtown. From Main Beach I headed south on Coast Hwy passing restaurants, shops, and galleries. I’m not sure what caught my eye but I happened to look to the right and saw a narrow open space. Had I been glancing across the highway I would have missed it. I paused, noticing a brick wall and what looked like a metal sculpture of two chairs and a table with a stack of books on top. I hesitated, not sure if it was ok to sit in the chairs, then went ahead and sat. It was comfortable and I decided it must have been created for both art and function.

After sitting for a while I continued on down the narrow way noticing the interesting brick design on the wall. Midway down was a plaque with a poem expressing a love for living in a house by the sea. I continued on to the fence at the end that overlooks the shore, then stepped back to read the words built into its metal work. Leaning on the rail I took in the beauty before me and relaxed into the rhythmic sound of the waves breaking on the shore.

Later when I was home I looked online to see if I could find some information on this park. I learned this was the site of a home that was destroyed in a storm. It had been in the same family for three generations. They decided to give this oceanfront property to the city to become a small public park, rather than sell it for personal profit.

Knowing this made Brown’s Park all the more beautiful to me. What a gift! Now when on a walk, many times I’ll include a stop there. As I soak up the beauty of the oceanfront view, I also soak up the beauty of the selfless gift this family gave, and thank them. Each time I leave with a grateful heart.

Suzanne Haugen Lopez

Laguna Beach


New Village Entrance is a big disappointment to me

After decades of meetings, reviewing, and rejecting proposed plans for the long awaited Village Entrance – much disappointment for me. I stopped by on Saturday morning to go to Farmers’ Market and check the parking/walking area. My first concern was the area just past the electric vehicle recharging as there is some garden/concrete jutting out forcing the driver to swing a bit to the left – problem is that if a large truck parked in one of the first few spots to the left (which there was) it makes it virtually impossible to navigate unless you are in a golf cart. The other part is that if a truck is parked where it narrows and there is a smaller car parked next to it, it would be difficult for the driver in the parked car to pull out safely until they get past the tail end of the larger vehicle. But by then the driver of the car looking for a spot may not see the car pulling out of the parking space. Seriously, it is very narrow, especially if the moving vehicle is in a large car. (I was in a 4-door sedan but luckily haven driven a Porsche for 40 years, I was able to maneuver by the truck could be stuck.) The curves continue and depending on how considerate the person who parked their car is – it would be like driving Le Mans.  Next – it was difficult to see the stripes delineating each parking spot, especially the front end as the stripes are painted a dark maroon. I wonder how visible it would be at night especially when it appears that only two or three large poles provide lighting? What surprised me is that the driving space leaving the parking walking area was wider than the area for entering. This was a flaw, in my opinion, with the original parking area and I had met with staff several years ago suggesting that the parking/driving area should be distributed better for incoming as well as outgoing cars. I was assured that it would be.

I had hoped that there would be public toilets and there weren’t. I can understand that planners did not want people sleeping or sitting all day long in that area – but if people are taking trolleys or walking from the Canyon – the only place to stop is by the Bus Station or the beach. Would you find that convenient if you have a child or are elderly and need to use facilities? I mentioned earlier lighting – still have concerns about that in general especially with people with poor eyesight.

What brought these points up? After I parked my car another driver was pulling up next to me and clearly did not want her front end hit by a car pulling in opposite her. However, that left the rear of her car vulnerable (it was not a large car) as there was a widening of the “garden/cement curbing.” Just as she was thanking me for helping her, a truck did pull up to park opposite her and he made a comment about how bad this was planned. He had come during the week and found that his SUV was not easy to navigate this new area. He uses the truck to buy produce from the Farmers’ Market and was trying it out. He decided that he would not be able to drive either vehicle there in the future. I made a comment about parking at the orange stand where I buy oranges and several people came over to where I was getting input from others and gave me a similar story – it was not easy to navigate (several elderly people made this comment), others said that they were concerned about the striping and lighting, and what was the point of all the plants. The stone benches and sidewalk took up a lot of space and people figured that on hot days few would sit there but homeless individuals, who may find it more entertaining and easier to solicit handouts.

I had wondered why so few cars (including this morning where it was still “free parking”) were not using the new parking area. Perhaps those are some of the reasons.

At one of the city council meetings that I attended when the finalization inputs were being given, I recall a council member suggesting that several of the green areas be made bigger since people were going to be driving smaller cars. Not exactly – SUVs and large trucks and Jeeps are hot selling cars and have been for several years. People do not necessarily check how they are parked once they are parked – that is to see if they are within the lines (will they be able to see them at night?) or if they are sticking out into the driving area. I suspect that there might be more parking accidents, short tempers…and maybe that is the reason that the parking lot has not been as full as hoped. This morning more people were parking by City Hall and paying than going to the new area and not paying.

Let’s hope we give more thought to form and function than pretty and think that everyone is out walking around that part of town – still far from the business area and with the loss of so many parking spaces even that “close” that is less potential for business. Let’s give more effort to help our business and visitors by giving future projects more thought. 

I have suggested at that the City’s Maintenance Yard, which is where the recycling events are held, we build a multi-story building by digging down and creating several levels of public parking leaving the top floor to office space for staff and perhaps putting a helipad on the roof. With the number of accidents and our limited access both two-way traffic in the Canyon, having a helipad might save some lives. But we also need to go underground there – PG&E was deemed negligent on several catastrophic fires and they are seeking bankruptcy protection. 

We have many issues to face and being practical and cost conscience is the only way we can achieve this. What do you think? 

Ganka Brown
Laguna Beach


All nonprofits should disclose public documents

The debate over PACs in Laguna Beach has seen both sides accusing the other of misleading the public. There is a simple solution. All nonprofits in Laguna should post on their websites tax returns, FPCC filings, state incorporation filings, financial statements, etc. They typically have a link on their sites to donate money digitally. I don’t donate unless the site provides easy access to public filings. I simply want to know what is your legal standing, who is running it, and how is my money being spent? 

If the organization is a PAC they must file a 990 tax return or declare an exemption. These can be found at: https://forms.irs.gov/app/pod/basicSearch/search?execution=e1s2. A preliminary search for Laguna Beach PACs shows the following have filed statements: LB Firefighters Public Awareness Group, LB Police Employees PAC, LB Republicans PAC ,and Village Laguna, Inc. Village Laguna filed tax returns. Although complicated, the Village Laguna returns state they are a PAC and that most of their revenues are spent on “political activities.”

Non-political 501(c)(4)’s, such as the many “community associations” we have in Laguna, must file tax returns. The IRS site can be used to find those returns. 

FPPC form 460 must be filed by campaign committees and PACs that support candidates and ballot initiatives. These are posted on the City website at: www.lagunabeachcity.net/cityhall/citygov/cityclerk/electioninfo/disclosurestatements.htmContributors must be disclosed along with how the money is spent. There are PACs that have donated to candidates but have not filed tax returns, maybe because the amounts are so small. 

I have a modest charitable trust I use to donate to my favorite charities. It’s managed by a reputable financial institution. When I ask them to donate to “Village Laguna, Inc” they decline since it would not be a tax-deductible charitable donation. 

The charges being exchanged between Village Laguna and Liberate Laguna could be fact-checked if all nonprofits posted all their regulatory filings on their websites. To be truly transparent, they should also post their financial statements, board members, corporate by-laws, etc. Everyone is free to donate to whatever cause they believe in. I don’t give if they are not open about who is running the organization and how my money is being spent. When invited to put my homes on the Charm House Tour, I told them I support historical preservation but won’t participate unless the money goes to philanthropic 501(c)(3) charities and not to political candidates.

Some have suggested the City should require all nonprofits domiciled in Laguna to register and disclose key documents. I would support that, but why not make it easy, be totally transparent by posting the information on their websites? That would increase the community’s confidence in these organizations and hopefully lessen the uncivilized mudslinging. 

Doug Cortez

Laguna Beach


Troops to Iran

Again, our frequent letter writer has it wrong, it seems. NYT printed an article saying “Sources at the Pentagon claim as many as 120,000 troops might have to be deployed to the Middle East.” POTUS said it was “fake news,” that there is no plan and that if we did, it would be a helluva lot more than that. If Iran attacked U S forces, maybe. C’mon...

William Kail

Laguna Beach

Our Letters to the Editor policy

Letters to the Editor encourage important and healthy discourse amongst residents and are protected by the First Amendment. We reserve the right to decline to publish letters that we perceive as personal attacks. The focus of letters should be on issues rather than on personalities. The best rule of thumb is that the decision of the editor is final.

Please send Letters to the Editor to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. for publication.